URL:http://www.southam.com/kitchenerwaterloorecord/columns/commentary1.html The Record WE'LL HAVE TO WAIT FOR COMPETITIVE WOMEN'S HOCKEY By Karlo Berkovich Record staff Thursday, January 15, 1970 Team Canada 22, Opposition 2. Shots on goal, 167-28. Shades of the U.S. Dream Team vs. Angola at the 1992 Olympic basketball tournament. Or the Harlem Globetrotters against the Washington Generals. Or, more accurately, Canadian teams over their foreign counterparts in the early days of men's international hockey.Those cumulative totals over three games definitely define lack of competition. Canada vs. anybody so far in the World Women's Hockey Championship has been a foregone conclusion. Which isn't so bad -- this is an obviously talented and well-directed outfit winning big through no fault of its own. But blowout win after blowout win can't be optimal in terms of preparation -- Canada coasted and fell into some bad habits Thursday after building a 4-0 first period lead over a Chinese team definitely not equipped with Silkworm missiles. And it's certainly not riveting entertainment. Good thing the event is being held in Kitchener, one of the top hockey hotbeds anywhere and a place that enthusiastically embraces all manner of high-profile sporting events. The rink is packed, the fans stay to the end and the hockey, at least from one perspective, is crisp and creative. But competitive? No. That's a function of the imbalance in the depth of player pools, funding and coaching and development programs that separate Canada -- and to a lesser extent the U.S. -- from the rest. China, a nation of more than a billion souls, is home to just 300 women's hockey players. Russia ices just six club teams and is anything but a world power. Less of a power, in fact, than the top three teams in the Central Ontario Women's League. Home to several Canadian national teamers, the league's three best teams would probably finish in the top five in the world tournament, behind Canada and the U.S. The Mississauga Chiefs, for instance, beat Switzerland 4-0 in a pre-tournament exhibition. And it's not just Canada that has been the bastion of blowout. Wide margins in both goals and shots (on the order of 61-5) were the rule rather than exception through the first three days of competition. Canada could have played without a goalie in its first two games and still won, outscoring Switzerland and Russia by a combined 15-1 while outshooting the opposition 107-12. "There's not enough good teams right now and it's hard to focus at times," Canadian forward Lori Dupuis said after Thursday's 7-1 win over China. "It is uncompetitive, but it's unbelievable when you consider that in 1990, some of these teams were losing by 20-0 scores." Essentially, this remains a two-team tournament, with Finland -- which tied the United States 3-3 -- on the fringes of challenging the Americans and Canada, Finland's semifinal opponent. That will change, though, as Dupuis noted. For one thing, the International Ice Hockey Federation is studying the possibility of eventually launching a B pool, something that would indicate development past the teething stage on a worldwide basis. Such development -- xenophobes be damned -- must be fostered by the exporting of coaches and systems by the current hockey powers. "I like to say it's still in its infancy stages," Canadian head coach Shannon Miller said of the international scene. "We have to make sure it grows, make sure others get better. By the 2002 Olympics, I think you'll see five strong countries." China and either Russia, which faces funding problems, or Sweden are the candidates for ascension. For now, though, from a Canadian perspective, for truly competitive hockey it remains a matter of bringing on the USA. The Kitchener Waterloo Record